All Right Here?

Having recently moved from the UK to South East Asia, a lot of people have asked me: "So, what's it like, then?" This is my attempt to answer that question.

Sunday, June 11, 2006

Swede Or Turnip?

It’s good to get a win under the belts, but England’s win against Paraguay has punctured the optimism I had been allowing to build up following the victories against Hungary and Jamaica, and more importantly after noting Sven’s cavalier demeanour in interviews over the last few weeks. I thought things might be different. Yesterday told me that England won’t win this World Cup, and it’s all because the manager persists in trying to fit square pegs in round holes.

Sadly, Sven has done most of his managing in Italy. He therefore manages as if he’s managing an Italian team. If we nose in front, there’s only one thing that we should do in his mind: defend the lead.

This is his third major tournament in charge and he still hasn’t realised that we don’t know how to do that. That’s not how we play in England. I thought he’d learnt that from the defeats against Brazil and Portugal in the last two tournaments and all those Premiership games he turns up at.

Sven has brought the young, fresh talents of Walcott and Lennon with him. Their selection in the squad was un-Svenlike, and was another of the reasons why I thought he might go out in style. The Paraguay game was a perfect opportunity to bring one, or both of them, on and keep the opposition on the back foot. What did Sven do? He brought on Downing, who isn’t a bad player, but is unlikely to change the game. Downing played two beautiful long passes, but they were both lateral balls from the left touchline to the right. He ran quickly, but then didn’t know what to do with the ball once he reached the penalty area.

As for Roger Hargreaves… does anybody anywhere understand why he’s in the squad? Did he do anything when he came on? Are these two the 12th and 13th best players in England?

Perhaps Joe Cole was injured, but he was our best player and I was shocked that he was taken off. I’m astonished to find myself admitting that Crouch was our second best player. I’m actually thinking that Crouch and Rooney would be a better combination than the invisible Owen and Rooney. Those slow-motion replays of the ball hitting Crouch in the face provided some rare moments of amusement, too. Perhaps Owen just needs a little more time. There's not much left, mind.

So, all my hopes that we’d see a cavalier, exciting, bullish, attacking, English England in this World Cup were deflated by Sven’s insipid substitutions in the second half. What’s astonishing is that there isn’t a single pundit, amateur or professional, who agrees with him, or can understand what he’s doing. What was the point in picking those young lads and creating all the hype if he’s not going to take a look at them? Do we really need to close down a game against Paraguay and therefore risk drawing it?

Sometimes I wonder whether maybe Sven’s plan is to use Walcott and Lennon if we’re losing. But when I think back to England v Brazil four years ago when England were 2-1 down, with Brazil down to 10 men, I remember that Sven brought Phil Neville on.

We won’t beat a good team playing like that. We won’t beat a good team if we don’t play to our strengths. We won’t beat a good team if we try to sit on a slender lead. What I don’t understand is how our coach hasn’t worked that out yet when everyone else has.

6 Comments:

  • At 11:05 am, Blogger Jonny said…

    I concur completely.

    Well said Mike.

     
  • At 10:07 pm, Blogger Andy said…

    Yes, me too.

    Having said that, I can understand why Sven wanted to defend the lead in this instance, being the opening game and all, which we almost always draw (in fact, someone told me that this is only the third time that England have won an opening world cup game).

    And just to pull in another cliche, don't forget that England will 'raise our game' for tougher opposition, apparently. (So long as Sven stops experimenting with formations that he's never tried before. Surely he's tried enough by now!)

    As for Hargreaves, he's been taking a lot of stick in the media over here, but it has prompted a lot of people who do actually watch the Bundesliga to defend him, saying that he is class for Bayern Munich, and can play the holding midfield role far better than Carrick, or even Carragher. He never seems to wearing an England shirt though...

     
  • At 3:04 am, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Didn't Roger Hargreaves' write the Mr Men? Ma x

     
  • At 6:14 pm, Blogger Me said…

    Andy, are you suggesting I made my comments about Hargreaves without any evidence other than his performances for England? Better than Carrick? Are you mad? Carrick plays for Tottenham, you know.

    And as for us raising our game - well, it hasn't happened so far under Sven. We didn't raise our game when we lost to Brazil in the last World Cup. We didn't when we lost to Portugal in the Euros, who in the end beat us by the narrowest of margins, but were all over us throughout the game. We also defended the entire game when we beat Argentina in the last World Cup in that game when Owen dived to win us that penalty. So if the tactic works once every three games, that ain't enough to win us the World Cup.

    Looking forward to eating my words.

    And yes, Roger Hargreaves did write the Mr Men. Well spotted. That's just my little nickname for him.

     
  • At 7:33 am, Blogger swisslet said…

    did you see Argentina today?

    If we meet them, we're fucked.

    Mind you - so might everyone else be.

    ST

     
  • At 9:21 am, Blogger Me said…

    Argentina were scarily good. Head, shoulders and torsoes above everyone else so far.

     

Post a Comment

<< Home